The introduction of electronic data capture devices has transformed how information for clinical trials is collected. It has enhanced the quality of data researchers work with and evaluate, resulting in better outcomes and judgments. However, there are still some questions about whether there are cases when electronic data capture Vs. paper-based records might be better in a clinical trial situation.
Nonetheless, this revolution is not without its drawbacks. In recent years, the EDC system has been enhanced with unique capabilities, settings, and features better suited to therapeutic fields of study.
However, some people still get confused when deciding between an EDC system Vs. paper-based clinical trial. Take a look at the key differences between the two to make the right decision:
1. Cost-Effective Decision
Some EDC systems are more suitable for specific trial phases than paper-based trials. For instance, a fully fitted EDC system isn’t required for the initial stages but rather the end phases of many trials.
For the initial phases of such studies, it is more cost-effective to use a less expensive solution with the necessary functions.
2. Electronic Data Capture Vs. Paper – Remote Access to Data
Intelligent EDC systems are cloud-based and allow remote access to clinical trial data capture and monitoring. The ability to securely access data remotely helps multiple teams working on the same research to observe trial results from their respective facilities, eliminating the geographical limitations of team-based research. However, paper-based documentation can be restrictive in terms of remote access to clinical data.
3. The Level of Accuracy
Like quality, you need accurate data in a clinical trial setting. Any errors, omissions, or changes in numbers can waste your time and resources. An EDC system guarantees accurate data for better decision-making. There are more chances of human error on a paper-based model.
4. Automated Systems
Integrated and automated EDC data management allows it to automatically administer operations such as medicine orders and report preparation. This feature is critical since it allows them to skip the time-consuming process of manually creating reports and instead focus on applying analytics to identify the consequences. Unlike paper-based documentation, such solutions save time and energy while increasing trial effectiveness.
It is pretty evident that EDC is the name of the game, and you shouldn’t hesitate to invest in a quality system. If you’re on the lookout for one, then check out the services and products provided by ClinicalPURSUIT.
ClinicalPURSUIT also provides Randomization and Trial Supply Management (RTSM) solutions and much more. You can schedule a one-on-one free demo today to learn more.